We usually see arts with titles that represent what the artist is trying to portray.
- Do you usually interpret art from your own perspective regardless of the title given by the artist?
- Do you usually follow what the artist feeds you?
- Do you need the artist's perspective as a base and then add your own interpretation to that?
I am usually comfortable with no titles for abstract arts as I prefer to interpret the meaning based on how they affect my emotions. For representational arts, I don't mind "straightforward" titles. However, a shift in naming convention in representational arts to include more abstract titles- titles that invoke our emotions rather than representing the aesthetics, may establish some sort of creative bridge between the artist and the viewer.